Last night I attended my very first toastmaster's meeting. Upon arriving, I saw a large number of people in a huge conference room. I was excited to see the amount of people there, thinking that I would kind of blend in with the crowd and no one would notice me (I did not want them to pick me out of the crowd to speak because I get very nervous when doing so). Anyway, I asked the person at the door if it was a toastmaster's meeting- and it was not. I went to the front desk in which the lady there informed me that the meeting was down the hall in a smaller room (I remember swallowing my saliva in my nervousness). When I got to the door I peeked in, and a gentlemen had waved me in. They were all dressed in business attire and I, of course, in jeans, t-shirt, and sneakers. I happened to be the only woman there, the only one in my 20s, and I felt like I stuck out like a sore thumb. There were about 15-17 men there, mostly in there 50s, 60s, 70s, and I believe one 80 year old man. The man who waved me in also invited me to sit next to him. He was very friendly and also one of the administrators of the group. He also happened to smell alcohol, however, he was very helpful in telling me how things are run in the meetings. It was a very loose environment in which they would occasionally have chit chat amongst themselves when things were going on.
The first order of business were table topics in which a few people are picked to speak about a topic and then they pick people out of the crowd to comment on their topic - the people who are picked out have to talk about the topic- unscripted, without and "um's" "awes" or other things that we say when we are searching for the right words.
The second order of business were the presenters. This was the real deal in which 2-4 people speak about a topic that they have chosen or one that the club has chosen for them. They are timed and there is a 3 light system which shows them when they are passing the allotted time. They also have a bell for when someone does have "um's" and "awes's", however it is not during the presenter's time, but whenever any other person is speaking.
The third order of business was the evaluation. This is when they give constructive criticism about the presenters. They give them feedback on what they did wrong, how they could improve, and what they did well in. They also have an evaluation on evaluators, on how well they spoke about the presenter. They also evaluate the people who presented table topics and what they did well, what they did wrong, and what they could improve on.
They also have a mini award giving at the end of the meeting in which they give ribbons for the the "best table topics", "best evaluator", "most improved toastmaster", "most improved speaker", and the "best speaker". It was an interesting experience for me to see a novice speaker to a experienced speaker. I will definitely use the information that was given to me for future pubic speaking tools. I also thought that it was a very informative experience for me that I enjoyed until the very end.
The first order of business were table topics in which a few people are picked to speak about a topic and then they pick people out of the crowd to comment on their topic - the people who are picked out have to talk about the topic- unscripted, without and "um's" "awes" or other things that we say when we are searching for the right words.
The second order of business were the presenters. This was the real deal in which 2-4 people speak about a topic that they have chosen or one that the club has chosen for them. They are timed and there is a 3 light system which shows them when they are passing the allotted time. They also have a bell for when someone does have "um's" and "awes's", however it is not during the presenter's time, but whenever any other person is speaking.
The third order of business was the evaluation. This is when they give constructive criticism about the presenters. They give them feedback on what they did wrong, how they could improve, and what they did well in. They also have an evaluation on evaluators, on how well they spoke about the presenter. They also evaluate the people who presented table topics and what they did well, what they did wrong, and what they could improve on.
They also have a mini award giving at the end of the meeting in which they give ribbons for the the "best table topics", "best evaluator", "most improved toastmaster", "most improved speaker", and the "best speaker". It was an interesting experience for me to see a novice speaker to a experienced speaker. I will definitely use the information that was given to me for future pubic speaking tools. I also thought that it was a very informative experience for me that I enjoyed until the very end.